Discrimination lawsuit. Why jury decision making emotional damages Essay

Discrimination lawsuit gatePresenting usher In tribunal proceedings, order is presented as either viva or scripted depending on the choice of the witness. In addition, the means of giving order whitethorn be typesetd by the court or the jury in charge chthonian various considerations. Both oral and pen proof micturate the same purpose and can be used as the basis of court ruling (Edwards et al., 2011). In this situation where as a forgiving resource I bequeath be needed to provide cause of a discrimination lawsuit, the written method of evidence founding will be the most appropriate to assist the questions from the venire. The method of written presentation will allow adequate to(predicate) age to prepare and present my part of evidence and with adequate in formations. Since the presentation of evidence requires info elaborate the truth about the matter and the organizations position on the case and the policy that were under consideration, the written evidence would help me to consult with other legal experts and answer questions accordingly. Oral evidence would prevent consultations that might go in inaccurate evidence that will be used to give unjust rulings. Moreover, written evidence will save a lot of term that could have been used to present the oral presentation in the court. In addition, whatsoever inconveniences would such as absenteeism in work place and productivity of the planetary house will be avoided (Edwards et al., 2011). Hence, written evidence will ensure that the operations of the business are not affected in each way. Moreover, it will reduce the cost incurred during the lawsuit proceedings. Finally, written evidence presents a proof that the information communicated is true and cannot be changes. This ensures that the evidence is not compromised since is always read and presented to court as the original copy of evidence. This is in contrast to oral presentation where evidence may be changed where one may b e questioned more than once hence compromising the evidence, which may affect the reliability of the evidence.panel decisiveness making emotional damages The Jury would rely on information from psychiatrists and medical experts who would measure out the damages that the complainant suffered as a go out of discriminations. This would involve psychological and mental problems that may have arose because of the discrimination (Edwards et al., 2011). Stress would be one of the conditions that may be evaluated and whether there were medical complications that resulted from the discriminatory numerals. In addition, the information about the pain suffered because of discrimination would be evaluated on medical basis. These sufferings could then be compared with any financial implications suffered. In addition, information regarding how the working and the productivity of the plaintiff was affected could be used to chance the level of the effects of emotional damages and and then for m the basis of fiscal compensation. For example, if in any case the discrimination resulted in decreased productivity of the plaintiff, which reduced the financial income of the income would form the basis of pecuniary compensation decision. Moreover, it could be evaluated based on how the act affected his or her defendant day-to-day life. mistakable during the proceedings, the defence presents their argument on the amount of monetary compensation that should be awarded to the plaintiff (Edwards et al., 2011). Jury determine the compensatory amount that should be paid to the plaintiff depending on the information provided by the defence team. When the court uses this information as the basis of their compensatory decision, the court act in favour of the plaintiff and it may end up awarding huge sums of money, which may be unfair to the respondent. Finally, the jury would use their freedom that is granted by the section of the law to determine the damage caused to the plaintiff and use the evidence presented to award monetary compensation. The decision could either be based on standardised cases that were ruled in the past of depending on the cogitate of the bench.ReferenceEdwards, L., Edwards, J. S., & Wells, P. (2011). Tort Law. Cengage Learning.Source document